|
|
|
|
Managing the sea for birds Fair Isle and adjacent waters
The requirements of the EC Wild Birds Directive (79/409/EEC) and Habitats and Species Directive (92/43/EEC) can be summarised as the following overall objectives for the proposed protected area:
2.2 Site conservation objectives For the purposes of this illustrative plan, three site-specific conservation objectives have been identified:
In common with RSPB (1997), the following broad policies are considered necessary to achieve the overall conservation objectives:
Safeguard food supplies; Minimise disturbance; Safeguard habitat (eg nesting sites, water quality); Improve understanding of seabirds; Ensure consistency with Habitats Directive.
The five recommended areas for action have been adapted from RSPB (1997): (Key words in the right-hand column show how the action relates to the overall conservation objectives. Underlined text indicates which broad policy is promoted by the proposed action.)
Species targets developed from the national targets, such as those included in Biodiversity Challenge (Wynne et al, 1995), can also be used to refine the overall objectives for a site and clarify what action needs to be taken. Where targets specify numbers, detailed analysis will be needed to determine the contribution which Fair Isle can make to that target, and should be part of the research required under Article 10 of the EC Wild Birds Directive to provide the basis for the protection and management of birds. It would be possible to set site-specific targets for Fair Isles breeding seabird populations (eg population size not to change between specified limits or below a certain proportion of the national or biogeographical population). However, most species were at their highest recorded levels in the mid 1980s, due to population increases partly attributed to unsustainable fisheries practices. Measures applied to ensure more ecologically sustainable fisheries management may lead to readjustment of seabird populations, within acceptable limits, below their peak levels. It is therefore preferable to have lower seabird populations feeding on natural food sources, than artificially high levels exploiting unsustainable fishing methods (eg discards). For these reasons, no attempt at defining species targets has been made in this report. However, target-setting is an essential principle for the management of any protected area, even if the key factor may not be population size. More appropriate variables may include chick growth rates and breeding productivity levels. Targets would need to be set individually for each species and would define acceptable limits of change. Species of national and/or international importance (see Table 3, Appendix 1) should be considered the key species for conservation action. The high diversity of seabird species breeding on Fair Isle is, in itself, of conservation value; measures that are responsive to established targets may benefit seabird diversity as well as the species of highest conservation concern.
|
|
Send mail to
dave.wheeler@fairisle.org.uk with questions or comments about
this web site.
|