FIMETI_logo_2.jpg (10645 bytes)

Up
2 Conservation Objectives

 

panel2.jpg (153634 bytes)

Managing the sea for birds – Fair Isle and adjacent waters

1 Introduction

Fair Isle is a small island that lies between Orkney and Shetland (Figure 1). This report is an illustrative management plan for a marine protected area in its surrounding waters with conservation objectives for seabirds. The aims of the report are to:

  1. Present the case for a more integrated approach to managing Fair Isle's surrounding marine environment;
  2. Provide illustrative recommendations that could form the basis for a marine management scheme in Fair Isle waters;
  3. Contribute to the debate on managing marine areas for conservation purposes;
  4. Promote the case for designation of marine SPAs to Government.

There is a strong case for better management of Fair Isle's surrounding marine environment. In recognition of this, a detailed resource description is given in Appendix 1 and the case for a marine protected area is presented in Appendix 2. The focus of the main report is on deriving recommendations for illustrative management measures to show how the proposed marine protected area could be managed. As such, the report does not aim to be a comprehensive management plan for Fair Isle waters.

 

The methodology used to do this follows that developed by the RSPB (1997). The flow diagram below illustrates this process:

Overall site conservation objectives (Section 2.2)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
Broad policies (Section 2.3)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
Main areas for action (Section 2.4)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
List of 'hazards' for consideration (Chapter 3)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
'Hazard evaluation' for each hazard (Chapter 3)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
Grouping of hazards into categories (Table 1)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
Allocation of desired outcome to each category (Table 1)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
Identification of management measures to achieve desired outcomes (Section 4.2)
AG00086_.gif (345 bytes)
Allocation of lead organisations for management measures (Table 2)

 

The emphasis in the report is on management of a marine SPA and an adjacent protected site beyond territorial limits. To enable this, the report proposes illustrative boundaries for the marine protected area and assumes that the site qualifies for protection as a Special Protection Area (SPA) under the EC Wild Birds Directive (79/409/EEC), and for equivalent protection in that sector beyond territorial waters. The report does not provide the scientific case for this, partly to avoid lengthy analyses of marine bird data and partly because there are only limited data available in any case. The illustrative boundaries should therefore be viewed as one of a number of options rather than a definitive proposal. In reality, a robust scientific case would have to be made for the site's protection and boundaries.

The illustrative boundaries of the proposed protected area are shown in Figure 3. The site has been sub-divided into four different ecological zones. The zones are based on the sensitivity of the marine communities to damage resulting from human activity. This is the approach recommended in the most recent guidance issued by the UK statutory agencies on the management of marine SACs and SPAs (SNH et al, 1997). The zones comprise:

Zone 1: Inshore waters up to 5 km from Fair Isle coastline;

Zone 2: Adjacent waters up to 16 km from Fair Isle coastline;

Zone 3: Proposed haddock nursery box (Figure 4);

Zone 4: Outer waters within proposed protected area.

Zone 1 demarcates the main foraging area for most breeding seabird species (especially those feeding mainly on sandeels). Zone 2 roughly defines the outer border of the sand/fine gravel substrate which is important to sandeels for breeding and shelter. Zone 3 constitutes the area which has been suggested as a possible haddock nursery box by the Shetland Fishermen's Association in the past (J. Goodlad, in litt). Zone 4 represents an illustrative buffer zone, with the boundaries drawn to link with specific lines of longitude. This enables the extent of the protected area's outer waters to be clearly defined and understood.

Management measures in each zone would need to account for its ecological sensitivity. Zones 1 and 2 are within territorial waters and are therefore suitable for SPA designation. Zones 3 and 4 are largely outwith territorial waters, but would benefit from appropriate management measures derived from protected status. Management of the two inner zones would be adequately covered by the administrative framework proposed in this report, whereas Zones 3 and 4 are clearly also relevant to a much wider constituency.

CONTENTS PAGE             NEXT PAGEl

 

Send mail to dave.wheeler@fairisle.org.uk with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1999 Fair Isle Marine, Environment & Tourism Initiative
Last modified: February 05, 2002